- address-policy-wg - mailman.ripe.net

2009-02 Moved to Review Phase (Allocating/Assigning Resources to the RIPE NCC)
by Ingrid Wijte 26 May '09

26 May '09

PDP Number: 2009-02 Allocating/Assigning Resources to the RIPE NCC Dear Colleagues The draft document for the proposal described in 2009-02 has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. This proposal sets out how the RIPE NCC can allocate/assign resources to itself. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-02.html and the draft document at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/2009-02-draft.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 9 June 2009. Regards Ingrid Wijte Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

2009-05 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
by Ingrid Wijte 26 May '09

26 May '09

PDP Number: 2009-05 Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs Dear Colleagues The proposal 2009-05, "Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs" has been withdrawn. It is now archived and can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-05.html The proposer, together with the Working Group Chairs, decided to withdraw this proposal due to insufficient support for it as it is written. Regards Ingrid Wijte Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

Re: [address-policy-wg] Historical questions about ip address policy
by Hank Nussbacher 24 May '09

24 May '09

At 06:25 PM 21-05-09 -0400, Milton L Mueller wrote: >2. When (i.e., what year) did RIPE-NCC first charge fees for services or >addresses? http://ftp.eenet.ee/doc/ripe/ripe-087.pdf From page 4: "Funding for the first year of operation of the NCC has been provided by EARN, the full national members of RARE, Israel and EUnet. These organisations have agreed to guarantee funding of NCC operation during the remaining three quarters of 1993." -Hank

1 0

Historical questions about ip address policy
by Milton L Mueller 22 May '09

22 May '09

If anyone knows the answer to these questions they will help in a policy study I am doing 1. When (i.e., what year) did RIPE-NCC first require RSAs or contracts as a condition of registering an address allocation or assignment? 2. When (i.e., what year) did RIPE-NCC first charge fees for services or addresses? 3. When (i.e., what year) did RIRs generally or RIPE-NCC specifically begin to use the 80% HD Ratio as a criterion for eligibility to receive more addresses? If this is considered too off-topic for this list please answer privately. Milton Mueller Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology ------------------------------ Internet Governance Project: http://internetgovernance.org

4 3

New RIPE Document: ripe-470
by Filiz Yilmaz 20 May '09

20 May '09

Dear Colleagues, The RIPE Document, "Policy Development Process in RIPE", has been updated. You can find the new document, ripe-470, at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-470.html This document obsoletes ripe-428. The update was limited to textual improvements to the document. There are no changes to the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP). The document also contains an updated policy proposal template and a new PDP timeline graphic. Kind regards, Filiz Yilmaz Policy Development Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

2008-05 Last Call for Comments (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
by Ingrid Wijte 12 May '09

12 May '09

PDP Number: 2008-05 Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM Dear Colleagues, The proposal described in 2008-05 is now at its Concluding Phase. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-05.html Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 9 June 2009. Regards, Ingrid Wijte Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

IPv4 PI assignment statistics
by Alex Le Heux 07 May '09

07 May '09

Dear Colleagues, During the Address Policy Working Group session at RIPE58, statistics were requested about the number and size of IPv4 PI prefixes that the RIPE NCC has assigned over the last few years. NOTE: The numbers for 2009 contain data up to May 2009. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 /16 0 1 0 0 1 /17 0 1 1 0 0 /18 1 2 3 10 1 /19 3 7 4 12 7 /20 25 28 23 44 14 /21 51 56 89 100 26 /22 260 261 261 402 111 /23 385 464 778 571 159 /24 726 897 973 1046 292 /25 10 22 8 8 5 /26 7 6 8 5 0 /27 5 8 7 7 2 /28 0 8 0 1 0 /29 2 1 0 8 0 Total 1475 1762 2155 2214 618 Please let us know if you require any further information. Best regards, Alex Le Heux RIPE NCC

1 0

RIPE NCC Now Accepting Requests for IPv6 PI Assignments
by Scott Donald 06 May '09

06 May '09

[Apologies for duplicate emails.] Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce that the RIPE NCC now accept requests for IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) assignments. This follows the accepted policy proposal 2006-01 "Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations". The request form and supporting notes are available from the RIPE Document Store at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6.html Requests can also be made via the LIR Portal, which is available at: https://lirportal.ripe.net/ IPv6 PI assignments will come from reserved block 2001:678::/29. You may want to update your filters. Regards, Scott Donald Registration Services RIPE NCC

1 0

RE: [address-policy-wg] Principles for the use of the last IPv4 /8 address space in the RIPE NCC Region
by Kelaidi Christina 05 May '09

05 May '09

Dear Sander Thank you for the e-mail. ETNO is aware of the policy proposals currently discussed in the RIPE community regarding the last /8. From the existing proposals it is clear that only 2009-04 is compliant to these principles. Christina Kelaidi -----Original Message----- From: Sander Steffann [mailto:sander@steffann.nl] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 1:22 PM To: Kelaidi Christina Cc: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Principles for the use of the last IPv4 /8 address space in the RIPE NCC Region Hello Christina, > ETNO has prepared an Expert Contribution on the Principles for the use > of the last IPv4 /8 address space in the RIPE NCC region, based on a > previous contribution with regard to IPv4 address exhaustion presented > in the RIPE address-policy-wg mailing list in May 2008. According to > ETNO any policy proposal relevant to the use of the last IPv4 /8 > address space should satisfy the principles contained in this > contribution in order to permit both a fair and equitable use of the > last IPv4 /8 address space and a flexible approach with regard to its > management. Thank you for your input. We currently have two policy proposals for the last /8: 2008-06: Use of Final /8 2009-04: IPv4 Allocation and Assignments to Facilitate IPv6 Deployment I think the best way forward would be for you to participate in the discussions related to these policy proposals on this mailing list. Thank you, Sander Steffann APWG co-chair ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. ******************************** ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. ********************************

1 0

Principles for the use of the last IPv4 /8 address space in the RIPE NCC Region
by Kelaidi Christina 04 May '09

04 May '09

Dear colleagues ETNO has prepared an Expert Contribution on the Principles for the use of the last IPv4 /8 address space in the RIPE NCC region, based on a previous contribution with regard to IPv4 address exhaustion presented in the RIPE address-policy-wg mailing list in May 2008. According to ETNO any policy proposal relevant to the use of the last IPv4 /8 address space should satisfy the principles contained in this contribution in order to permit both a fair and equitable use of the last IPv4 /8 address space and a flexible approach with regard to its management. Introduction ETNO recognises that with the theoretical date of exhaustion of IPv4 public addresses fast approaching, principles ensuring fair and equitable use of the last /8 address space in the RIPE NCC region are required. This contribution presents a number of such principles in order to initiate such discussions that are intended to lead to a RIPE NCC policy. ETNO in a previous contribution with regard to IPv4 address exhaustion identified a number of principles associated with the management of IPv4 public addresses as exhaust approached. These principles form the basis of the principles below as applied to the last /8 address space. In the development of this Expert Contribution, regarding the use of the last IPv4/8, ETNO wants to guarantee that any policy developed is based upon the fair and equitable allocation of address space to all LIR's, irrespective of whether they are new or existing. Principles Demonstrated Need Allocation Allocation of IPv4 addresses from the last IPv4 /8 should be treated the same way for all Registries (LIR), and should be in response to their demonstrated need. Pre-determined Use Assignment from the last IPv4 /8 should only be used to facilitate the deployment of IPv6 Public address resource by the LIR. Size of Address Allocation The size of any allocation from the last IPv4 /8 should be based upon flexibility, recognising that it is an allocation from the last /8, and meeting the needs of the applicant. As a consequence the size of address allocated may require adaptation of the current and existing allocation rules. Predictability of Allocation Relevant policies associated with the allocation from the last IPv4 /8 should be announced well in advance in order to give sufficient time for operators and ISPs through their LIRs to be prepared. Conclusion ETNO supports the development of a RIPE policy detailing how the last IPv4 /8 will be deployed in order to ensure clarity for all stakeholders. ETNO believes that the above principles should be the basis of any RIPE policy related to the last IPv4 /8 and supported by the implementation of appropriate measures and actions. Christina Kelaidi ETNO Naming Addressing and Numbering Issues (NANI) WG Chairperson ETNO (European Telecommunications Network Operators' Association) is representing 40 major companies from 34 European countries, providing electronic communications networks over fixed, mobile or personal communications systems. ETNO's primary purpose is to establish a constructive dialogue between its member companies and actors involved in the development of the European Information Society to the benefit of users. More information on ETNO can be found at: www.etno.be.

2 1