- address-policy-wg - mailman.ripe.net

2010-05 Draft Document will be produced (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
by Emilio Madaio 30 Sep '10

30 Sep '10

Dear Colleagues, The discussion period for the global policy proposal described in 2010-05 has ended. A draft document and an Impact Analysis will now be prepared for review. We will publish the document shortly and we will make an announcement. You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-05.html Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

Call for agenda items for RIPE 61 in Rome
by Gert Doering 27 Sep '10

27 Sep '10

Hi AP WG members, RIPE 61 in Rome is coming up quickly, and Sander and I have started building the agenda. It will, of course, contain all the usual stuff ("what has happened in policy development in the last 6 months", "discussion of new policy proposals") but if there is anything else you want to see discussed, please let us know. Either here, or via apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net A first draft of the agenda will be published soon. Gert Doering -- Address Policy WG Chair -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

1 0

2008-07 Policy Proposal (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources): possible withdrawal
by Emilio Madaio 27 Sep '10

27 Sep '10

Dear Colleagues, RIPE policy proposal 2008-07, "Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources", has completed the Discussion Phase. The proposer has decided to withdraw this proposal. If there are any volunteers who would like to take over this proposal and re-submit it to the Policy Development Process (PDP), please email address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net. The proposal is available online at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-07.html Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

Suggested updates to 2010-05 (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
by Chris Grundemann 25 Sep '10

25 Sep '10

Hello APWG, After receiving great feedback in several regions, the original authors of the proposal have discussed all of the feedback received and our suggested revisions are below: Problem #1: The allocation method was unfair. The intent was never for a single RIR to be able to be allocated all available address space in mass quantities. We do however want any available address space to be utilized if there is need. We've addressed what we would characterize as a mechanical issue. --new text: Section 3. Address Allocations from the Reclamation Pool by the IANA Allocations from the Reclamation Pool may begin once the pool is declared active. Addresses in the Reclamation Pool must be allocated on a CIDR boundary. Allocations from the Reclamation Pool are subject to a minimum allocation unit equal to the minimum allocation unit of all RIRs and a maximum allocation unit of one /8. The Reclamation Pool will be divided on CIDR boundaries and distributed evenly to all eligible RIRs once each quarter. Any remainder not evenly divisible by the number of eligible RIRs based on a CIDR boundary equal to or larger than the minimum allocation unit will remain in the Reclamation Pool. Addresses that are left over will be held in the Reclamation Pool until additional IP addresses can be returned to rejoin addresses on CIDR boundaries to the Reclamation Pool or a minimum allocation unit is set to allow allocation from existing inventory. Problem #2: Without excluding transition space, some RIR's would never be eligible. To address this, we've defined a /10 exemption for any/all pools of address space set-aside by any RIR. --new text Section 4. RIR Eligibility for Receiving Allocations from the Reclamation Pool Upon the exhaustion of an RIR's free space pool and after receiving their final /8 from the IANA[3], an RIR will become eligible to request address space from the IANA Reclamation Pool when it publicly announces via its respective global announcements email list and by posting a notice on its website that it has exhausted its supply of IPv4 address space. Exhaustion is defined as an inventory of less than the equivalent of a single /8 and the inability to further assign address space to its customers in units equal to or shorter than the longest of any RIR's policy defined minimum allocation unit. Up to one /10 or equivalent of IPv4 address space specifically reserved for any special purpose by an RIR will not be counted against that RIR when determining eligibility unless that space was received from the IANA reclamation pool. Any RIR that is formed after the ICANN Board of Directors has ratified this policy is not eligible to utilize this policy to obtain IPv4 address space from the IANA. These revisions are being proposed in all regions in order to maintain consistency in the policy text on the global level. Thank you for your consideration. ~Chris -- @ChrisGrundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com www.burningwiththebush.com www.coisoc.org

5 8

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks to Regional Internet Registries
by Filiz Yilmaz 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Dear Colleagues, Proposal 2009-07, "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries", was accepted by the RIPE community in September 2009. This proposal has since reached consensus in all other RIR communities and it is now also ratified by ICANN in September 2010. You can find the policy documented at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-480.html Kind regards, Filiz Yilmaz Policy Development Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
by Emilio Madaio 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Dear Colleagues, Following the feedback received,a new version of the policy proposal 2010-02 'Allocations from the last /8' is edited and published. The draft document and the impact analysis for the proposal have also been published. You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html and the draft document at: http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-492-draft2010-02.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 19 October 2010. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

New Document: Policy Development Process in RIPE (ripe-500)
by Filiz Yilmaz 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

[Apologies for duplicate emails] Dear Colleagues, A new RIPE Document, ripe-500, "Policy Development Process in RIPE", is published. This document obsoletes the previous version of the document, ripe-470. The main feature of the updated document is that it better explains the Impact Analysis that the RIPE NCC performs within the RIPE Policy Development Process. Kind regards, Filiz Yilmaz Policy Development Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

Address Policy WG Minutes from RIPE 60 / Prague
by Gert Doering 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

Hi AP WG list, thanks to Susannah from the RIPE NCC, the minutes from the APWG meeting in Prague are now online: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/address-policy/minutes.html (The long delay since Prague is actually my fault in not reviewing the first draft quickly enough) please review the draft and send in anything that is not as you remember the session, or any typos, or whatsoever. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 155817 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

1 0

2010-04 Last Call for Comments (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)
by Emilio Madaio 09 Sep '10

09 Sep '10

Dear Colleagues, The proposal described in 2010-04 is now at its Concluding Phase. You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-04.html Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 7 October 2010. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

The review phase for 2010-04 (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup) has ended
by Sander Steffann 07 Sep '10

07 Sep '10

Hello working group, As Gert has already told you he won't be acting as working group chair when discussing proposal 2010-04, as he is the author of that proposal. It falls to me now to decide if we have consensus on this proposal. During the lifetime of this proposal there have been 16 messages on the list declaring support for this proposal, and no questions or objections. I feel confident that this is a very clear case of consensus and therefore I ask the PDO staff to move this proposal forward to the concluding phase (“Last Call for Comments”). Sander Steffann APWG co-chair

1 0