- address-policy-wg - mailman.ripe.net

2007-01 implementation clarification
by Andy Davidson 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Hi, A customer has indicated to me that they want PI space for a business or project that is not incorporated. Under the new 2007-01 rules, what is the correct way to request PI? In UK law, a business might not be incorporated, but in such circumstances, the income and actions of the business are treated as the income and actions of the principal person behind the business. In such circumstances does this mean the individual should apply for PI? Previously I'd have advised to use the trading name to apply for PI, but under new rules I am aware that PI holders need to be able to sign contracts... The trading name might not be a legal entity able or willing to sign. They plan to multihome, their need for PI appears justified to me. Andy

5 4

Minutes from RIPE 57 (Dubai)
by Gert Doering 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Hi APWG, the minutes from RIPE 57 are now online: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/address-policy/r57-minutes.html if you feel there is anything missing or inaccurate, please let us know. Many thanks to the folks at the RIPE NCC for this amazing job! Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

1 0

2007-01 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC
by Andrea Cima 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

[Apologies for duplicate emails] Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce that phase one of policy proposal 2007-01, "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC", will be implemented on 3 March 2009. This change will require that an End User have a contractual relationship with a sponsoring LIR or the RIPE NCC before the End User can receive Internet number resources (Autonomous System (AS) Number, Provider Independent (PI) IPv4 and IPv6, Internet Exchange Point (IXP) and anycasting assignments) directly from the RIPE NCC. The full text of policy proposal 2007-01 can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-01.html Phase one addresses the implementation of the new policy in relation to all new requests for independent numbering resource assignments. Please note that from 3 March 2009, End Users requesting independent numbering resources must sign a contract with a sponsoring LIR or with the RIPE NCC in order to receive those resources. Requests for independent numbering resources that do not demonstrate such a contract will not be processed by the RIPE NCC. Information on the required content of contracts between End Users and sponsoring LIRs is available at: http://www.ripe.net/membership/lir-end-user-requirements.html Phase two of policy proposal 2007-01 will address the contractual relationship between End Users who hold previously assigned independent numbering resources and the RIPE NCC or a sponsoring LIR. A plan for implementation of this phase will be presented at the next meeting of the RIPE NCC Services Working Group, which will take place at the RIPE 58 Meeting in Amsterdam from 4-8 May 2009. Kind regards, Andrea Cima RIPE NCC

5 5

2008-09 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
by Filiz Yilmaz 12 Feb '09

12 Feb '09

PDP Number: 2008-09 ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs Dear Colleagues, The proposal 2008-09, "ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs", has been withdrawn. It is now archived and can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-09.html Given the recent publication of RFC 5396, the proposer and the Address Policy WG Chairs have agreed that there is no need to keep 2008-09 in the RIPE Policy Development Process. RFC 5396 can be found at: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/rfc/rfc5396.txt Following feedback received in RIPE 57, the Address Policy WG Chairs have also concluded that the current RIPE Policy Document ripe-389, "Autonomous System (AS) Number Assignment Policies and Procedures", will be updated so that the reference to the previous registration format is deleted from the policy document. We have now published a draft RIPE Policy Document, in which the changes are marked: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-389-draft-2008-09.html We encourage you to read this document and, if you have any comments, send them to <address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net> before 12 March 2009. After this date we will publish the draft document as a RIPE Policy Document. A further announcement will be made shortly regarding the full implementation of the ASPLAIN registration format for 32-bit AS Numbers by the RIPE NCC. Regards, Filiz Yilmaz Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

3 2

RE: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
by IP-Office KPN 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

All, Thank you for all replies to my question:) We support proposal 2006-01 as is and Andy's proposal to go forward. With kind regards, Andries Hettema IP-Office KPN Internet 070 45 13398 ip-office(a)kpn.com -----Original Message----- On 10 Feb 2009, at 12:47, Gert Doering wrote: > But I can see your point - there might be cases where, for whatever > reason, > a LIR might want to assign a separate network to itself, and indeed > this > is not currently covered by 2006-01. [...] > - do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, > and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on > (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it). There are significant advantages to passing "as is" with the aim of getting the policy passed quickly, because I do believe there are networks who are not LIRs waiting for v6 PI to be allowed in Europe. If others agree with my premise that an organisation's status with the NCC should not be a barrier to v6 PI, I will propose the policy to fix. Thanks Andy ________________________________________________________________________ ______________ This inbound message to KPN has been checked for all known viruses by KPN MailScan, powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit: http://www.kpn.com, keyword 'Mailscan' ________________________________________________________________________ ______________

1 0

2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
by Filiz Yilmaz 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

PDP Number: 2006-01 Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations Dear Colleagues, The text of the policy proposal 2006-01 has been revised based on the community feedback. We have published the new version (version 5.0) today. The draft document for the proposal has also been published as well as the impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html and the draft document at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-421-draft2006-01-v5.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 9 March 2009. Regards Filiz Yilmaz Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

17 21

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
by Remco van Mook 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

All, I strongly support Marco's position on this. Let's get this policy done asap and deal with changes in a later document. Kind regards, Remco ----- Original Message ----- From: address-policy-wg-admin(a)ripe.net <address-policy-wg-admin(a)ripe.net> To: Gert Doering <gert(a)space.net> Cc: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net <address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net> Sent: Tue Feb 10 13:18:35 2009 Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations) On 10 feb 2009, at 13:47, Gert Doering wrote: > What you ("you" as in "the community") now need to make up your mind > about > is: > > - do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, > and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on > (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it). > > - do you want to adapt 2006-01, which means "at least one extra round > of discussion/review phase". Let me voice support for 'move on as is' and discuss any changes to it in a new proposal. This whole PI thing has been on hold for too long. Groet, MarcoH This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.

2 1

New IPv4 blocks allocated to RIPE NCC
by Alex Le Heux 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

[Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC received the IPv4 address ranges 109/8 and 178/8 from the IANA in January 2009. We will begin allocating from these ranges in the near future. The minimum allocation size from these two /8s has been set at /21. You may wish to adjust any filters you have in place accordingly. More information on the IP space administered by the RIPE NCC can be found at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-ncc-managed-address-space.html Please also note that several "pilot" prefixes are being announced from each /8. These prefixes are: 178.0.0.0/16, pingable 178.0.0.1 178.1.0.0/21, pingable 178.1.0.1 178.1.24.0/24, pingable 178.1.24.1 109.0.0.0/16, pingable 109.0.0.1 109.1.0.0/21, pingable 109.1.0.1 109.1.24.0/24, pingable 109.1.24.1 They all originate in AS12654. More information on this "pilot" activity is available in the document "De-Bogonising New Address Blocks", which can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-351.html Best regards, Alex Le Heux RIPE NCC Policy Implementation Co-ordinator

1 0

AW: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
by Marcus.Gerdon 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

I can only agree with this. IPv6 PI is in progress far to long by now, so let's finally get it done. regards, Marcus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Systemtechnik Internet / Internet Engineering Versatel West GmbH Unterste-Wilms-Strasse 29 D-44143 Dortmund Fon: +49-(0)231-399-4486 | Fax: +49-(0)231-399-4491 marcus.gerdon(a)versatel.de | www.versatel.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: Dortmund | Registergericht: Dortmund HRB 21738 Geschäftsführer: Marc Lützenkirchen, Dr. Hai Cheng, Dr. Max Padberg, Peter Schindler ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AS8881 / AS8638 / AS13270 | MG3031-RIPE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: address-policy-wg-admin(a)ripe.net > [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net] Im Auftrag von > Marco Hogewoning > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009 14:19 > An: Gert Doering > Cc: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net > Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document > Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End > User Organisations) > > > On 10 feb 2009, at 13:47, Gert Doering wrote: > > > What you ("you" as in "the community") now need to make up > your mind > > about > > is: > > > > - do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, > > and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on > > (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it). > > > > - do you want to adapt 2006-01, which means "at least one > extra round > > of discussion/review phase". > > > Let me voice support for 'move on as is' and discuss any > changes to it > in a new proposal. This whole PI thing has been on hold for too long. > > Groet, > > MarcoH > >

1 0

2007-08 Implementation: IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region
by Xavier Le Bris 27 Jan '09

27 Jan '09

[Apologies for duplicate emails] Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce that the policy proposed in proposal 2007-08:"Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources" has been implemented. The RIPE NCC is now ready to accept requests for IPv4 address space transfers under the new policy. This proposal can be found at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-08.html The updated 'IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region' document is available at: http://ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-441.html The following RIPE document has also been updated to reflect this policy implementation: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-446.html Regards, Xavier Le Bris Registration Services RIPE NCC

1 0