- address-policy-wg - mailman.ripe.net

2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
by Marco Schmidt 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Dear colleagues, The proposal described in 2014-12, "Allow IPv6 Transfers", is now in its Review Phase. The draft document has been published, along with an impact analysis conducted by the RIPE NCC. You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-12 and the draft document at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-12/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 21 January 2015. Regards Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

6 10

2014-03 Review Period extended until 12 February 2015 (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
by Marco Schmidt 07 Feb '15

07 Feb '15

Dear colleagues, The Review Period for the proposal 2014-03, "Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments" has been extended until 12 February 2015. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-03 We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net>. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

6 5

2014-13 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow AS Number Transfers)
by Marco Schmidt 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

Dear colleagues, The proposal described in 2014-13, "Allow AS Number Transfers", is now in its Review Phase. The draft document has been published, along with an impact analysis conducted by the RIPE NCC. You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-13 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-13/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 21 January 2015. Regards Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

16 18

2014-12 Review Phase Period extended until 10 February 2015 (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
by Marco Schmidt 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Dear colleagues, The Review Phase Period for the proposal 2014-12, "Allow IPv6 Transfers" has been extended until 10 February 2015. We request your feedback, even if you have provided it during the initial Discussion Phase, so that the Working Group Chairs can determine whether there is rough consensus. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-12 We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net>. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

6 5

2014-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Language Clarification in "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region")
by Marco Schmidt 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Dear colleagues, The proposal described in 2014-07, "Language Clarification in "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region"", is now in its Review Phase. The draft document has been published, along with an impact analysis conducted by the RIPE NCC. You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-07 The draft document is available at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-07/draft We encourage you to read the draft document and send any comments to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 9 January 2015. Regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

3 3

RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
by Nigel Titley 25 Jan '15

25 Jan '15

Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC Executive Board has closely followed the ASN discussion on the Address Policy Working Group mailing list. The issue of the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme has been raised, so I'd like to give you an idea of the Board's thinking on this. We hope this will inform the discussion and also give sufficient time for members to give their feedback, which we will take into account when making a Charging Scheme 2016 proposal to present to the General Meeting (GM) in May this year. The issue of reintroducing a charge for ASNs was raised at the last GM in November 2014. You can follow the details of that discussion in the GM minutes: https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/ncc/gm/november-2014/minutes-ripe-ncc-gen… This discussion, interesting though it was, did not result in a conclusive outcome on how the membership would like the Board to proceed with regard to ASNs. It also raised the issue of charging for PI address space. Another issue raised at the previous GM during the discussion on providing RIPE NCC services for Legacy Internet resource holders was that members can vote only to approve or reject the Charging Scheme as a whole and they cannot vote on individual aspects of the Charging Scheme. In trying to address the Charging Scheme-related issues raised, the Board would like to make two statements: Firstly, the Board would like to retain the current "one LIR, one fee" Charging Scheme model that was approved by the membership and which provides fairness, predictability and simplicity for RIPE NCC members. Secondly, the Board strongly believes that the Charging Scheme should be aligned with RIPE Policy. For this reason, there is a separate charge for PI resources that ensures alignment with ripe-452, "Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region (2007-01)". With this in mind, the Board would like to offer two different proposals for the Charging Scheme 2016: 1. The Board can propose a Charging Scheme in advance of the May GM and have the membership discuss the proposal. The Board would take the discussion into account before proposing a final Charging Scheme to be voted on by the membership in May. or 2. The Board could take a two-step approach to the Charging Scheme. In May, members would vote on individual issues such as charging for ASNs. The result of the voting would then be used to create a Charging Scheme that would be voted on in the usual way by members at the November GM. The RIPE NCC Executive Board is appointed to represent the interests of the membership. For this reason, we encourage you to give us your feedback on these proposals so that the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 can come as close as possible to reflecting the wishes of the membership. You can discuss the proposal and related Charging Scheme issues on the Members Discuss mailing list (members-discuss(a)ripe.net <mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>) or you can contact the Board directly at exec-board(a)ripe.net <mailto:exec-board@ripe.net>. The next Executive Board meeting takes place on 19 March, so we would appreciate your feedback before that date. I will also copy this mail to the Address Policy Working Group mailing list to ensure all interested parties are aware of the Board's thinking. Best regards, Nigel Titley RIPE NCC Executive Board Chairman

5 4

Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
by Daniel Davis 23 Jan '15

23 Jan '15

Hi, Our comment on thIs proposal is: We would not support this proposal to Remove the IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8. This is because his policy encourages ripe members to start the process of using ipv6 addresses, and that given the shortage of ipv4 space migration is becoming increasingly important. By changing this policy we believe this will give out the wrong signals to the industry about ipv6 migration. Best Regards, Daniel Davis Director Blue Sky Systems Limited Tel: 03300 101 550<tel:03300%20101%20550> Mobile: 07718 425 855<tel:07718%20425%20855> Email: daniel(a)blueskysystems.co.uk<mailto:daniel@blueskysystems.co.uk> Web: www.blueskysystems.co.uk<http://www.blueskysystems.co.uk/> Registered Office: Unit 16 Horizon Business Village, 1 Brooklands Road, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 0TJ<x-apple-data-detectors://1>. Registered in England No: 8856125<tel:8856125>.

10 19

2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
by Lukas Wunner 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

Hi, > The proposal described in 2014-12, "Allow IPv6 Transfers", > is now in its Review Phase. I fully support this proposal. Best regards, Lukas Wunner (LW26-RIPE)

1 0

(no subject)
by Sascha Luck [ml] 20 Jan '15

20 Jan '15

<nick(a)inex.ie> Cc: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net Bcc: Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03 Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <54BE4A1F.7050008(a)inex.ie> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:29:19PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: >On 20/01/2015 12:23, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: >> All in all, an unelegant solution. Besides, I like the idea of >> a "flat-rate" charging scheme where you pay yor membership fee >> and have all your services for the year covered. > >that would be nice, except ASNs are assigned to end users not >LIRs. A large number of end users with ASNs are not LIRs. Just noticed that 2007-01 *is* in effect for ASNs, so I guess assignments to non-members are not materially affected by the proposal. rgds, Sascha Luck

1 0

Internet Number Resources Approved to the RIPE NCC
by Maria Stafyla 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC Arbiters Panel has approved a request for an IPv6 PI assignment and an Autonomous System Number (ASN) resource to the RIPE NCC for its resiliency node in Stockholm based on the RIPE Document, "Allocating/Assigning Resources to the RIPE NCC", and the RIPE NCC procedural document, “RIPE NCC Conflict Arbitration Procedure”. You can find the full announcement at: https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/about-ripe-ncc-and-ripe/int… If you have any questions, please send an email to feedback(a)ripe.net Kind regards, Maria Stafyla The secretary of the Arbiters Panel of the RIPE NCC

1 0