- address-policy-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Re: [address-policy-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
by Gert Doering 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

Hi, On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:16:41AM +0000, Elad Cohen wrote: > I didn't attack anyone, I only responded to a defamation post against me in your working group, which to it you didn't write anything. > > Ronald is aCoconut by many people, and he is defaming me and calling me > in names for many many months, including in the post in your own working > group - which you completely ignored As I said, it was not necessary to have a third WG chair repeat the same thing that Briand and Denis already said. Calling someone "a Coconut" is definitely not the type of tone we want here. Stick to factual discussions, take the name-calling elsewhere. (Note that Ronald did not mention your name at all, so it is very helpful that you make abundantly clear *who* he refers to, so we can do a much better informed executive board election). > - so this says a lot about yourself and about your title as a co-chair, Yes! I was so hoping for a new round of "Gert Doering is totally unworthy of being a WG chair". We haven't had this in a long while. > So go ahead, Gert, attack me once more in an unbalanced way. I'm not attacking anyone, I'm just trying to remind people of house rules. You are are calling names, and you are damaging your own reputation by repeatedly refusing to adhere to list etiquette aka "house rules". Gert Doering -- AWPG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

3 4

Re: [address-policy-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
by Gert Doering 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

Hi, On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:35:33AM +0000, Elad Cohen wrote: > You are lying and you are part of "The Spamhaus Project", your company is sponsoring "The Spamhaus Project" as can be seen here: Stop it. And to all other readers: if you want to reply to Elad, please do not copy the list, even if it is very tempting. Nothing useful for the address-policy working group can come from further mails in this thread. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

1 0

Re: [address-policy-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
by Gert Doering 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

Hi, On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:11:12PM +0000, Elad Cohen wrote: > I responded to Coconut Guilmette that posted in your list. > > If you let him post in your list then you should allow me to respond to him in your list. The mails from the other WG chairs have made it very clear that crossposting to unrelated WGs is not seen as acceptable use of our lists. We're not moderating the lists, so yes, anyone can post anything - but usually people are considerate enough to not do so. If someone slips, we correct, and expect others to listen and learn. Among these acceptable and inacceptable things is "ad-hominem attacks" - so whatever quarrels you have with others, calling someone a "Coconut" on a public list mostly reflects on yourself and your ability to handle personal discrepancies on a professional level (which is, I might say, a strong requirement for a RIPE NCC executive board position). Now, feel free to yell at me privately all you want, but keep non-AP-related stuff off the AP WG list. Gert Doering -- AWPG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

1 0

Re: [address-policy-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
by Elad Cohen 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

Hello, I responded to Coconut Guilmette that posted in your list. If you let him post in your list then you should allow me to respond to him in your list. Thank you. Regards, Elad ________________________________ From: Gert Doering Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 1:08 AM To: Elad Cohen Cc: address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette Hi, On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:46:52PM +0000, Elad Cohen wrote: > Please forgive me for not writing an official response in first set of Ronald's online madness months ago, I was out of hospital after full anesthesia and it took me months to get back to myself. Please stop posting abuse-wg and NCC membership related stuff to the address-policy WG list (and other WG lists), unless it is *relevant* for the list in question. Your squabble with Spamhaus is not relevant for RIPE address-policy. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

1 0

My response to Ronald Guilmette
by Elad Cohen 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

Hello Everyone, Please forgive me for not writing an official response in first set of Ronald's online madness months ago, I was out of hospital after full anesthesia and it took me months to get back to myself. Ronald is misery person with nothing and with no one in his life, the only joy that he have in his life - is for him to serve as the front person of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project". Here is a presentation that "The Spamhaus Project" wrote on themselves (in the following link) and according to it Spamhaus is an illegal anonymous organization - they receive a massive amount of illegally obtained privacy data of internet users from internet companies and internet organizations on a regular basis - and then they share it in illegal way (without any warranty) with law enforcement agencies. https://www.scribd.com/document/445894312/Spamhaus-Illegal-Private-Data-Vio… Ronald doesn't deny himself being part of "The Spamhaus Project", not only that - but his old friend Hank Nussbacher is also part of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project", Hank reminds me Judas Iscariot - Hank obviously have other interests - it is very sad to see a person at the age of Hank acting like a little child. All the few reports that were made were made by reporters which are connected to "The Spamhaus Project" and that are part of "The Spamhaus Project" - not only that, the source of the media reports is a person in "The Spamhaus Project" which is the owner of that illegal twitter account: https://twitter.com/underthebreach , that person is a criminal according to his own words in his own twitter account - and that person is also a master of cyber influence operations (just like what Coconut Guilmette and Cheerleader Nussbacher are doing here, to influence public opinion without any single proof) - and the owner of that twitter account is also an employee of the israeli-based company GeoEdge which financially benefit from that media report because they are a direct competitor of the company using the exact same netblock, so now I'm explaining to you that that root of this all fake story is just business competition, and in addition Coconut Guilmette also attacked the Israeli-based company Divinetworks in Nanog (Coconut Guilmette searched an unreasonable way why they received a specific grant from a global world organization and also defamed them) - so here is why he did it - the Israeli-based company Divinetworks is also a direct competitor of the Israeli-based company GeoEdge - that their employee is a criminal and the owner of the illegal twitter account https://twitter.com/underthebreach and also the "source" for the fake few media reports. In the following link you can see how a high manager in GeoEdge is highly proud in how customers attracted to him after the "low value" of competitors, if only the world would knew how that company does business. https://imgur.com/7DF1NSP That company GeoEdge is not only a criminal company in the way that they do business (because their criminal employee in "The Spamhaus Project" is the one pumped Coconut Guilmette proof-less ideas), but that company is also a criminal in the way that they are tax-evading since 2005 (they are registered in Cyprus with fake-single-owner abroad while they have more actual hidden owners in Israel that didn't pay any tax for their income since 2005, and one of the registered owners is using an international fake name and he is a professional money-laundering person, not only for that Israeli company). They (Coconut Guilmette, Cheerleader Nussbacher and their mob friends at "The Spamhaus Project") are very very afraid of me releasing all the information that I found out on the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" - and that is the only reason that they are attacking me personally in such way, they are trying to ruin my good name - but they didn't succeed and they will not succeed - because anyone that knows me and anyone that will personally know me - will know what they are trying to do and that what they are writing is 100% false. All the personal attack against me - is only because I dared to stood up against "The Spamhaus Project" which is intimidating and hurting many businesses online, and I would and will do it again and again and again, I'm not the kind of a misery bendover jew like Hank that will sell his values and his being for a title, a group acceptance or a few cents. Coconut Guilmette, is not only a sick person, in body and mind, but also a racist and an antisemitic, you can see in the following links his stereotypical mindset: https://imgur.com/AcmgwEX (Coconut Guilmette opinion on all Dutch people as a whole - "Dutch are any more inclined toward cybercrime") https://imgur.com/WUZvdNJ (Coconut Guilmette opinion on all Colombian Network Operators usage of the internet as a whole - "Undoubtedly drug smuggling over HTTP") https://imgur.com/a/1ULfVEC (Coconut Guilmette opinion on the City of Chicago including all of its citizens as a whole - "American city most known for its high ideals and consistantly ethical behavior, Chicago") https://imgur.com/AQCmZlk (Coconut Guilmette identified as racist in Nanog) https://imgur.com/a/Rzrbxkz (Coconut Guilmette identified as antisemitic in Nanog) Besides the above links, Coconut Guilmette is specifically calling me with two words and here he is quoting Shakespeare: https://imgur.com/AcmgwEX , the two words that Coconut Guilmette is calling me are being used in Shakespeare litrature to identify jews in an antisemitic way, Coconut Guilmette is an antisemitic, I'm very sorry to write it but Ripe is not a decisive organization towards racism or antisemitism, the Tone in Ripe management and in Ripe board and in this working group co-chairs, is a very narrow tone that only reflect the good of the people in their positions, Ripe board & management are not taking any actions for Ripe to be a multi-culture multi-national unpolitical organization that it needs to be with the tolerance to anyone and with the decisive intolerance to racism or antisemitism. The encouragement of Cheerleader Nussbacher is even worst because Cheerleader Nussbacher is encouraging someone which is a racist and an antisemitic. Hank, how more self-hating jew can you be ? to support such person only to be part of an illegal anonymous organization ? to support racism ? to support antisemitism ? And to the rest of the community, anyone that wrote to this person - "nice story, but you could say it in other words" - you are a lowlife as Hank is, you don't treat a racist or an antisemitic person with tolerance, period. Ripe is a RIR which is spread over 3 continents over many countries, Ripe members are different from each other by all means, I would expect Ripe community not to tolerate racism in any way and when Ripe members see it - to stand up - like I dared to stand up against "The Spamhaus Project". Ron, seeing a person at your age that knows to get attention only by using racism and antisemitism is sad, but seeing the lowlife Judas Iscariot cheerleading your mental illness is sadder. Here are only some of the real identities of the people behind "The Spamhaus Project": "Rob Shultz" - Rob McEwen (https://www.invaluement.com/) "Thomas Morrison" - Daniel R. Thomas (https://personal.cis.strath.ac.uk/d.thomas/) "Pete Dawes" - Ildiko Pete (https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~ip358/) "Vincent Hanna" - Vincent Schonau of Open-Xchange (https://www.linkedin.com/in/vincentschonau/) "Milly Fawcett" - Kelly Molloy of FarSight Security (https://www.linkedin.com/in/kelly-molloy-b886442/) Among others Commericial companies behind "The Spamhaus Project": ThreatSTOP FarSight Security Fastly Cymru Among others Keep on playing with me Coconut Guilmette and Cheerleader Nussbacher and I guarantee to you that the full list will be written here, you can hurt me as much as you please - I am not boneless and will not fold like Hank "Judas Iscariot" Nussbacher. The only reason that Coconut Guilmette returned to life in this thread - is because I wrote two days ago the real identity of "Rob Shultz" (which is Rob McEwen of https://www.invaluement.com/ ) to the co-chairs of this working group with CC to Ripe Board and to Ripe Management, I asked for the initial post of lies of Coconut Guilmette to be removed and I showed to them the relation of one of the current co-chairs of that working group to the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" which the poster Coconut Guilmette is related to it too. (also in the past there was a co-chair of that working group which is part of "The Spamhaus Project", Richard D G Cox, as you can see in his presentation that I linked to it above) That is the only reason (that I revealed that "Rob Shultz" from "The Spamhaus Project" is Rob McEwen) that Coconut Guilmette and Boneless Nussbacher are personally attacking me, not only that - but soon you will also see a new fake media report about me from the same reporter that used the criminal https://twitter.com/underthebreach as his source - all of it (like it was then and like they are trying to do now) - is to maneuver the subject of who are the real people behind "The Spamhaus Project" and to which internet companies and internet organizations they are connected to. "The Spamhaus Project" is an illegal anonymous organization and an unregulated organization, by being unregulated it is abused by the some of the members of it for making money, without any supervision, for example the criminal which is the owner of the illegal twitter account https://twitter.com/underthebreach that did what it did only that GeoEdge will earn a few more cents, such as Laura Atkins from WordToTheWise which is selling a Spamhaus listing removal service (https://wordtothewise.com) such as Vincent Schonau (AKA "Vincent Hanna" of "The Spamhaus Project") from Open-Xchange, a company that Spamhaus are attacking its competitors, and there are many more Spamhaus members that are using Spamhaus for their financial benefits. "The Spamhaus Project" - by being unregulated and unsupervised - is also being used as tool to attack business competitors, this is something that should wake up each and every member of the internet community. Hank, why do you let Coconut Guilmette to do the hard work for you (of defaming me) ? because you know that he have nothing in his life and a lawsuit against him will not result any financial aid ? why are you abusing his mental illness ? you know that he is not fine, why don't you help him like a good old friend ? Go ahead and write what Ron is writing so I will be able to sue you locally in Israel (I'm willing to pay you 100,000 NIS if you are right in a single thing that you wrote or that you will write against me, are you willing to do the same ? are you willing to put your money where your words are? or are you boneless that can only exploit the state of your old friend? ) I respect Ripe NCC and Respect all the members of Ripe Anti-Abuse Working Group. (P.S.: you can recognize now any member of "The Spamhaus Project" that will jump now, if he will attack me or support Ron, you can just ask him a simple question - "show us a single proof" - and you will see that no proof will be displayed, because all of it is part of an illegal "cyber influence operation" by "The Spamhaus Project" pumped by the criminal https://twitter.com/underthebreach) Respectfully, Elad

2 1

RIPE NCC Executive Board election
by Ronald F. Guilmette 17 Apr '20

17 Apr '20

Greetings all, I know that all is not right with the world right now, and that most of you, like me, have much more pressing things on your minds right now, but someone just sent me the following link and I cannot exactly ignore it: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/may-2020/confirmed-ca… I would like to call everyone's attention to the last of the three candidates who have, it seems, "qualified" as candidates for open seats of the RIPE NCC Executive Board. As I have already said, I know that things are bad in the world right now, but I must ask this question: Is there really no one other than these three candidates who is willing and/or able to stand for the three open seats on the RIPE NCC Executive board... three open seats that will be voted on at the next general meeting, 13-15 May 2020 ? If not, then it seems that RIPE NCC will soon be following in the new tradition, established first by AFRINIC only last year, of placing well and widely known crooks on it board. I desperately hope it won't come to that, but that is not for me to decide. The decision is in your hands dear friends. Regards, rfg

4 5

New AS Number Blocks Allocated to the RIPE NCC
by Nikolas Pediaditis 02 Apr '20

02 Apr '20

Dear colleagues, On 1 April 2020, the RIPE NCC received the following AS Number blocks from IANA: 210332-211355 211356-212379 212380-213403 You may want to update your records accordingly. All allocations of AS Numbers made by IANA to RIRs are listed here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/as-numbers.xhtml Kind regards, Nikolas Pediaditis Registration Services & Policy Development Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

2019-06 Proposal Accepted (Multiple Editorial Changes in IPv6 Policy)
by Petrit Hasani 16 Mar '20

16 Mar '20

Dear colleagues, Consensus has been reached on 2019-06, "Multiple Editorial Changes in IPv6 Policy". This proposal aimed to remove obsoleted text and simplify the IPv6 policy. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-06 The new RIPE Document is called ripe-738 and is available at: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-738 We estimate that this proposal will take around one month to fully implement. We will send another announcement once the implementation is complete and the new procedures are in place. Thank you to everyone who provided us with your input. Kind regards, -- Petrit Hasani Policy Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

2019-06 Last Call for Comments (Multiple Editorial Changes in IPv6 Policy)
by Petrit Hasani 11 Mar '20

11 Mar '20

Dear colleagues, Proposal 2019-06, "Multiple Editorial Changes in IPv6 Policy", is now in Concluding Phase. This proposal aims to remove obsoleted text and simplify the IPv6 policy. The WG co-chairs have declared that rough consensus has been reached and the proposal will now move to Last Call. As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Concluding Phase is to give an opportunity to present well-justified objections for those who missed the previous two phases and wish to oppose the proposal. Any objection must be made by 11 March 2020 and must be supported by an explanation. If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the proposal will complete the PDP and will be evaluated by the WG co-chairs for final consensus. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-06 Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to <address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net> before 11 March 2020. Regards, -- Petrit Hasani Policy Officer RIPE NCC

3 2

2019-06 Extended Review Period has ended (Multiple Editorial Changes in IPv6 Policy)
by Erik Bais 11 Feb '20

11 Feb '20

Dear Workingroup, After the extended review we received enough support (and no objections or voices against the policy proposal. ) As the AP-WG chairs, we think that the policy proposal should go to Last Call. If there is something in the policy that you don’t agree with, please let it know after the formal announcement for Last Call by Petrit. And if you do agree with the policy moving forward, please let it know in the Last Call phase as well, as it is easier for us as Chairs to call consensus or not, if we have some response. Regards, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG Chair collective

6 5