The point of views you have expressed, HAVE been discussed, and they have been considered previously, by the working group.

You are free to feel that they haven't been adequately considered, and that point is adequately made.

However, your point of view didn't gain consensus, or even break consensus.

At this point in time, it's too late for you to raise the same points again, no matter how much you disagree with how things stand.

At this point in time, you may raise NEW concerns. You haven't, though.

I see that you feel it's more important to make noise, than to follow the procedures.

If you really felt so strongly about this, which I sincerely doubt, you would have started the process with a counter-proposal, annulling the effects of 2015-01. You could have had a new proposal on the table right away, and the PDP could have started, and if your proposal gained consensus, it could have taken effect early next year.

But your choice is to make noise instead. This is disrespectful to us other group members.

PS:

WG chairs, my apologies for posting this, but I really, really felt the need to point out that this isn't just something of Gert's doing.