Joao Damas;
The point I raised has nothing to do with how multi6 intends to achieve it's goals, rather with the fact that the current attitude towards policy making for IPv6 seems to have the underlying assumption that there is a need to drastically reduce the number of organisations that can get allocations to reduce the number of entries in the routing table. This happens at the same time that there is a group working on solutions so it shows little faith in the outcome of the work.
In multi6 WG, there certainly is a proposal to reduce the number of TLAs.
I am arguing for a change in mentality that, while keeping memory of the good lessons learned in IPv4 (eg. allocation size related to network size, via variable sized prefixes) does not keep newcomers from deploying IPv6 (eg. a LIR -> an allocation or variations)
Then, accept the fact that we can't have so much TLAs. A simple way to do so is to allow TLAs only to national IRs. There are other ways, too. Masataka Ohta