On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
* Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
If we have separate space for /24 allocation policy then at least I can filter the de-aggregation and stop some of the madness.
Use the 2002::/16 space for 6to4 unicast routing. You do not need special software (works out of the box), you do not need special allocations, you only have to ask for route objects. If you do not accept those routes, the system still works.
And if 6to4 get's depreceated sometimes, all those more specific routes, setup etc. will vanish altogether by dropping 2002::/16 ge 16 routes.
No no no no. I do NOT want to duplicate the IPv4 table into IPv6 by doing that. I'd rather have a single /24 route per ASN for 6RD than multiple routes per ASN into 2002::/16. Also, the problem 6RD tries to solve won't be solved if I filter to only 2002::/16 and don't accept more specifics. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se