Re: [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)

On 21 October 2011 11:44, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:

   www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-04

Okay, I can see the logic, but please can we not do this :) I'm all for allowing a policy that says LIR can request a /29 rather than a /32 and that deploying 6rd is a valid reason for allocating a /29 as an initial block but can we do this by having the LIR send the documentation in and having it reviewed for logic. J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476