Hi James, Hi all, James Blessing wrote at 27.11.2017 13:32:
The only open question I see is if the examples included in the wording are broad enough in terms of scope to enable a clear decision as to whether a "usage" is (or is not) a sub-assignment? For me it's clear but I'm a native bad english speaker and would appreciate confirmation from non-native speakers just to make sure
As being a bad non-native english speaker it is clear to me that the usage of an PI IPv6 address through one of your endusers on your own infrastructe is clearly not a sub-assigment. As Max stated out even RIPE NCC had to use addresses from a PI Assignment on serveral RIPE-Meetings to supply IPv6 addresses to the attendees of the meetings. So it is pretty clear to me that i, as a attendee, was using RIPE-NCC infrastructue and not asking RIPE NCC for an IPv6 sub-assignment of their PI-Space. Best Regards. Matthias Kluth Senior Network Consultant HeLi NET Telekommunikation GmbH & Co. KG Hafenstr. 80-82 D-59067 Hamm Tel.: +49 (0)2381 / 874-4502 Fax: +49 (0)2381 / 874-4551 Mobil: +49 (0)173 / 5411102 Email: mk@helinet.de Web: http://www.helinet.de -- HeLi NET Telekommunikation GmbH & Co. KG Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamm - Amtsgericht Hamm HRA 1881 Komplementaerin: HeLi NET Verwaltung GmbH Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamm - Amtsgericht Hamm HRB 2781 Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dipl.-Kfm. Ralf Schuette