24 Nov
2010
24 Nov
'10
2:12 a.m.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:43:54PM +0000, James Blessing wrote:
How about
ripe-wg-
Where WG is replaced with the initial WG short code (so WG in this list would be ap and the final ref would look like ripe-ap-2010-9999)
Where is the added value of encoding a WG in the identifier? The PDP is cross-WG anyway so why introduce semantics in the proposal ID? Especially in the light of proposals touching multiple WG. I would suggest the prefix $RIR-PDP-$year-$number, e.g. RIPE-PDP-2010-4711 PDP for Policy Development Process, a term universally used by all RIRs. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0