30 Sep
2013
30 Sep
'13
11:45 p.m.
Hi, On 9/30/13 6:47 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 30/09/2013 17:41, Tore Anderson wrote:
Then you would have only one path and no confusion:
RIR[RIPE NCC] -> LIR -> End User
you would have confusion about who the address space holder was and what the end user's rights and obligations were to the ripe ncc. If you're going to suggest this, talk to the RIPE NCC legal eagles because it's a difficult area.
Nick
I agree Nick, however, Tore does have a point, we may have to find a definition to the current holder of PI. This organisation will now be able to sub-allocate and will essentially become a 'sub-lir' cheers, elvis