Hi, On 05/23/2011 03:10 PM, Sander Steffann wrote:
Current policy can be read by several ways. We're just playing with words - current policy doesn't force making single /22 allocations from other blocks than 185.0.0.0/8 (last /8) - it just says "if you have to allocate something from 185.0.0.0/8, you can do only do this and this..." in my eyes. Section 5.6 talks just about the last /8 and this is quite clear description. Last /8 is single address block.
That is not what it says. The text is: "The following policies come into effect as soon as RIPE NCC is required to make allocations from the final /8 it receives from the IANA. From then on the distribution of IPv4 address space will only be done as follows:"
It says, 'the distribution of IPv4 address space' in general. Once the RIPE NCC has to allocate addresses from the last /8, then from that point in time the distribution "will only be done as follows", which is specified in the "1. Allocations for LIRs from the last /8" and "2. Unforeseen circumstances" sections. The text is pretty clear that I think.
Article name is: "Use of last /8 for PA Allocations" - that doesn't mean other /8... it's all only about last /8.
If some address space is returned, then I don't see any reasonable argument, why not (re)allocate more than /22 to someone else, if someone needs new addresses and meets other criteria.
Because the current policy specifies that this is not possible. That can be changed by proposing a different policy of course. Current policy keeps this question open. And new proposal is similar - if some article is named "use of last /8" (5.6), it cannot influence other /8's - or this article name doesn't make sense. Last /8 is only one and policy had to be clear.
Final decision is still on RIPE NCC
The RIPE NCC can only decide what we (the community) tell them to decide. They follow the policies we set here on this mailing list.
And I don't see any argument, why tie RIPE NCC hands by applying this policy to other /8's. Current procedures can be used without any problem anytime - even in future on returned address space. If no addresses are available except last /8, allocations are simply proceeded in accordance to section 5.6, if there's some other address space available, standard procedure can be applied. Daniel