29 May
2007
29 May
'07
12:21 p.m.
Hi Randy,
ok, i give. if ula address space is assigned/managed by registries, how is it actually different from pi space?
Basically ULA space has the same 'routability' as RFC1918 space, with the added benefit of less (or in case of ULA central: no) possibility for conflicting addresses when merging/connecting separate networks. PI space is expected to be routed globally (if the user of the space wants to).
if ipv6 space is effectively infinite (and we once thought ipv4 space was), then what is the use of ula address space? why not just assign vanilla ipv6 space?
At this moment there is no IPv6 PI spa