Dear Kai,
The statement is "3.1. The LIR has not transferred any IPv4 address space to another LIR, a member of another RIR, or an End User."Dear Mr. Schmidt,I want to make a comment on your proposal "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria“.
We became RIPE member about 1,5 years ago. We have received one single /22 subnet. Due to groth requirement, we have purchased an additional /23 subnet a few weeks ago in an auction.
In you proposal it is stated that for an additional /22 allocation the member „must not have transferred any IPv4 address space before“.
This would not affect LIRs that reiceved space.
I hope this requirement only concernes transfers away from us, not to us. Otherwise I find it very unfair that we are punished for organizing additional subnets in a legal way for our regular business. We don’t intend to trade with those IPs.
regards
Best regards,
Kai Rottleb
--KNT Internet, Inh. Kai RottlebRiethnordhaeuser Str. 7199189 Hassleben, GermanyMail: kai.rottleb@knt.ioTel: 036201 61055Mobil: 01723971017
Ing. Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori@wirem.net Mobile: +39 339 8925947 Mobile: +34 602 009 437 Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943
WIREM Fiber Revolution Net-IT s.r.l. Via Cesare Montanari, 2 47521 Cesena (FC) Tel +39 0547 1955485 Fax +39 0547 1950285 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re- plying to info@wirem.net Thank you WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC) --------------------------------------------------------------------