I really fail to see the reason behind the 200 other organisation rule - perhaps someone would like to explain the logic.
I think the logic is that the RIRs are trying to portion out routing space so that we don't get a global routing table explosion in IPv6 in the same way we have (had) in IPv4. To acheive this, they need to make sure that the small ISPs don't get their own allocation, but instead go to their upstream provider for an IPv6 address space delegation. I can't really see another reason for this particular aspect of the policy. No, I don't think I agree with this policy, but I think I see what the RIRs are trying to conserve. I also have to agree with Pekka; "200 assignments to other organizations" can only be interpreted one way. Not that 199 or 200 would make all that much of a difference, so that's a minor point. Regards, - Håvard