24 Oct
2011
24 Oct
'11
8:52 p.m.
On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Nothing wrong in that, the world keep growing so it's just fair the address-space grow with it.
why are we screwing around? let's go straight to a /16 or at least a /20.
So you're proposing to adjust the proposal for a minimum size of /20?
It's a tough fit inside RIPE's /12, but I always thought that was too narrow-minded in the first place. With a /20 per LIR, RIPE would need a /7 now and a /6 soonish - which would be nicely utilizing the available space inside FP001...
Somebody (or hopefully somebodies) forgot a smiley. Regards, -drc