3 May
2011
3 May
'11
2:38 p.m.
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Sascha Lenz wrote:
The cost for independent resources is there just to remind the people that they should give them back if they don't need it anymore (in contrast to the former solution where just abandoning resources didn't cost anyone anything), not to hinder anyone from actually getting them in the first place.
That's your opinion, I don't agree.
Well, if you don't agree (you have a right to) please list some arguments that will change others opinion. I personally support Sascha arguments. Regards, Marcin