On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:20:18PM +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
The problem is that the "additional allocation" policy is far more draconian than the "initial allocation" policy.
HD ratio doesn't matter for the initial alloc, but for any additional alloc.
What I read here is that probably we'll have to revise additional alloc policy part when we are done with 2011-04, am I right?
Yesterday. I see 2011-04 more as a vehicle to buy us three more bits to fix the additional allocation policy mess hopefully in time before folks need more than a /29, and that's why I don't oppose it. :-)
BTW, a proposal was recently brought forward in ARIN-land, trying to fix similar IPv6 subsequent allocation policy mess: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2011-November/023758.html https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2012_2.html (their criteria for another allocation is "75% or more of their total address space, or more than 90% of any serving site" being utilized) Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0