I support this proposal, however with 2 comments: - I would like to see a merger of the various proposals trying to change 466 so we can review the full changed document once - How do these changes relate to the first line "..It was developed through joint discussions among the APNIC, ARIN and RIPE communities." Grtx, marco On Jun 8, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Remco van Mook wrote:
Dear all,
In line with my comments on this mailing list earlier this year, I support this proposal. While this proposal is similar in intention to 2009-06, I think having both options available for the community would be an improvement over having just one.
Kind regards,
Remco
On 03-06-09 12:09, "Ingrid Wijte" <ingrid@ripe.net> wrote:
PDP Number: 2009-08 IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Assignments for LIRs
Dear Colleagues
A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion.
You can find the full proposal at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-08.html
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 1 July 2009.
Regards
Ingrid Wijte Assistant Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/ subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.
MarcoH