Dear all, After some thinking I have deceided to withdraw this proposal for two reasons. i) I am not able to find a wording that properly reflects the inention ii) There would be a conflict of interest if I were to declare consensus on a proposal authored by myself. others are of course welcome to reword and submit another proposal. best regards, Hans Petter Holen
Dear Address Policy WG, This policy proposal is nothing more than an editorial change - but we still feel it is fair to run it trough the PDP. As I do not expect much discussion I propose the discussion phase to end by May 1st.
While I am voicing this proposal the suggestion actualy comes from our excellent RIPE NCC staff. Thanks leo for pointing this out.
Best Regards Hans Petter Holen Address Policy
1. Number Zeta
2. Policy Proposal Name: Adding Regional Boundaries to policy documents
3. Author
a. name: Hans Petter Holen
b. e-mail: hpholen@tiscali.no
c. telephone: +47 45066054
d. organisation: Visma IT AS
4. Proposal Version:
5. Submission Date: 16/4-2005
6. Suggested WG for discussion and publication
Address policy type
7. Proposal type:
a. modify
8. Policy term:
a. permanent
9. Summary of proposal
Our AS assignment policy has the following statement in it:
"The RIPE NCC assigns AS Numbers for Autonomous Systems located in the RIPE NCC service region"
Neither the IPv4 nor the IPv6 policy documents have such a clear statement in them. It might be a good idea to add a similar statement to those documents when they are updated.
10. Policy text
a. Current (if modify):
b. New:
11. Rationale:
a. Arguments supporting the proposal
Clearification of the scope of the documents
b. Arguments opposing the proposal
n/a