-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-03-23, at 14.23, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
Howeverm, the "out of a single block" is the part that really bothers me. Putting supposedly "critical infrastructure" as it is called elsewhere in a block that makes them all share fate in the event of network "optimisations" is still a bad idea.
Well, this can be argued the otherway around as well. We know that ISPs filter out previously unused space, and that they are not very active in updating those filters when IANA starts allocating out of new blocks. Having all in well-known block would limit that.
...wouldn't we/you/they/all have to do some filtering the "other way 'round" if all of those prefixes are contained in _one_ superblock to guard against someone/something announcing (and potentially black- holeing(sp?)) a route for that /32?
Eh, I would assume there is no /32 to announce and that more specifics will always win. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQkHau6arNKXTPFCVEQKUhgCfWIZjB4+fjTez5hZNa/4pYPbCqLUAoJsI 0HcVTYcqA0SIVDxYFEuONSBk =mmQ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----