-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Randy, On 2004-01-10, at 16.53, Randy Bush wrote:
From my observation on this discussion there seem to be no other parties beside TLD operators that are currently so much interested in setting up anycast services. At least, nobody said so on this list.
i have deployed non-dns anycast services a number of times in the last decade. next.
the problem is that you then apparently had access to routable space. Which not everyone has today. It's been done for other services, and it has been done for DNS for a long time. And yes, we should find a solution for other people wanting to do anycast as well. But in most cases, I suspect that they already have access to other sources of address space. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQAFeJqarNKXTPFCVEQIxvgCeJv/Va6Z4pT2yTRoZ+GiFl/jdDOoAoItg RJkPms5IeZ8f1RjExHP4XyIR =as3W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----