Just for the record: part of the WG Chair's job is to judge the "roughness"
of consensus based on the amount of supporting and opposing voices - both
the number, and the quality of arguments have to be weighted (and to some
extent the person making a certain argument).

I'm certainly not among the fans of Lu but seeing such a statement from the WG Chair is unbelieveble. Really ? Do you ever judge a statement based on who is making it and not objectively ?

In my opinion there is no space for any such extent and yes your job should be to represent an impartial and objective arbitration. Otherwise, I get the impression you are many times too subjective and try to enforce your personal opinions on others.

If you can not be impartial and objective it would be only honourable from you to step down, join us in the debates and let someone else do the job.

But as I've noticed (and nobody cared) you're one of the hoarders of last /8 so I really don't expect you to do that.

Ciprian