17 Sep
2012
17 Sep
'12
1:02 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> wrote:
On 17/09/2012 10:47, Gert Doering wrote:
... I'm not sure if "every time the available pool for X is empty, just grab another slice of the rest and declare it to be 'available for X, but limited!!'" is a reasonable strategy...
+1
To be clear, as proposer of this policy, I'm interested in a long term solution for PI so that we have long term policy clarity for PI assignment in the RIPE service region. I'm not interested in a series of stop-gap measures.
Strong agreement on both from me. I support this PDP precisely because it enables fair run-out without arbitrary limits or temporary stop-gaps. -- Richard