Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Ondřej Caletka wrote:

The only difference is that with PI, the it is the RIPE NCC evaluating the rules, which seem to be too strict in considering what should count as sub-assignment. But if we try to fix this, let's keep the fix working both for PI and PA addresses. Just because the problem is not visible in PA world does not mean it does not exist there.

I see what you mean here, but this is something that has been almost universally ignored for PA assignments since forever. Nick