22 Oct
2010
22 Oct
'10
2:24 a.m.
On 21 October 2010 14:23, James Blessing <james.blessing@despres.co.uk> wrote:
I have 256 machines and 1 router, that's 257 addresses required. Under the new wording I can't then have a /23 because I have a requirement for 253 more addresses to make it up...
Under that circumstance you'd get a /23 under existing policy. The intent seems to be that if you'd normally be assigned a /29-/25, it's rounded up to a /24. The limit of 248 addresses presumably being to stop abuse, by enabling the NCC to assess this 'slack' across multiple allocations. David