Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-07, was [Re: 2014-08 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in "Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region")]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:20:52PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:

On 24/10/2014 07:16, Peter Koch wrote:

...

thanks, Nick, my mistake, indeed. 2014-08 seemed OK (except for the misapplication of RFC 2119). The comments were in response to 2014-07, "Language Clarification in "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region"

Uh, are you sure the comments weren't intended for 2014-11? At least one of us is thoroughly confused here, possibly both.

you aren't, I was and that twice, which is why I decided, after noting it, to move slowly, stick to handrails all day and probably throttle postings a bit. Still I think I said what I meant and still mean w.r.t. policies affecting the NCC. Have a nice weekend, Peter