On 19 Oct 2016, at 12:34, Ciprian Nica <office@ip-broker.uk> wrote:
But my problem at this point is not with an idea being right or wrong but with the fact that you are not a fair arbitrer.
In your (utterly flawed) opinion. I’m fairly sure the overwhelming majority of the people of this list have absolute confidence in the integrity of the WG’s co-chairs. If you think you can do better, feel free to stand the next time the appointment process runs.
As a WG Chair my opinion is that you should not take sides.
There is no evidence whatsoever to support your claim that Gert (or Sander) are “taking sides”.
It's a simple question from a member of the community to one of the WG Chairs: did you abuse the last /8 or not ? Do you consider yourself a neutral arbitrer or not ? Do you consider yourself the one that should be judging others ?
Here’s a simple rhetorical question for you. Do you think making unjustified ad-hominem attacks and insults like the above will encourage support for your position on this policy proposal? Your behaviour here is unacceptable and way, way, way out of line.
Or is it your "job" to shut the voices that are not according to your interests ?
No. That’s *my* job. :-) Until you apologise and learn how to conduct yourself properly on this list, Ciprian SHUT UP.