Hi, On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:00:46PM +0000, boggits wrote:
On 4 March 2013 13:46, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
The draft document for the version 2.0 of the proposal 2012-02, "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
Just re-read this and thought that:
"Such address space must not contain any block that is assigned to an End User"
might cause a problem for those want to transfer space with the end user intact or even in some cases maybe just the end user. I know its out of scope, but was there logic behind this?
Well, that's the "original" transfer policy - which compromised on "ok, we'll permit transfers, but only transfers of empty PA blocks!" Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279