+1 from me on this I think that at ripe72 someone gave an example with a situation where this would be a problem and the policy would solve it. That's what we need. Clearly identify a real problem and propose a policy to fix it. Great job ! Ciprian On Friday, October 21, 2016, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification" is now available for discussion.
The goal of this proposal is to define sub-assignments in IPv6 PI assignments as subnets of /64 and shorter.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net <javascript:;>> before 21 November 2016.
Regards,
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum