On 2 dec 2009, at 09:09, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
* Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
If we have separate space for /24 allocation policy then at least I can filter the de-aggregation and stop some of the madness.
Use the 2002::/16 space for 6to4 unicast routing. You do not need special software (works out of the box), you do not need special allocations, you only have to ask for route objects. If you do not accept those routes, the system still works.
And if 6to4 get's depreceated sometimes, all those more specific routes, setup etc. will vanish altogether by dropping 2002::/16 ge 16 routes.
If 6to4 would be the solution we don't need 6rd at all, there are already modems which implement 6to4, even more as there are which support 6rd. Based on last weeks discussion I don't think 6to4 is considered a solution at large. MarcoH