Should ULA-C be published in the Whois database? what about reverse DNS for them, should they be delegated or just reply a NXDOMAIN?
let's see. ula-c should be assigned and tracked by rirs. they should have whois and in-addr.arpa. do remind me how they differ from pi space. i keep forgetting.
Oh, they differ because they are supposedly "not routeable on the public big-I Internet" because "they will be filtered away by ISPs". However, I suspect you are perhaps hinting that when a sufficient number of organizations have been given ULA-C addresses, the pressure on ISPs is going to be like "oh, pretty please, for this amount of $$$, can you please route these ULA-C addresses for me across your network", and after a while with the sheer meat- weight of all the sloppily-handed-out ULA-C addresses, we will have re-created the swamp from IPv4 (192/8)? Regards, - Håvard