On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:40 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
1) When you believe you agree with a policy proposal and declare it to the list (so chairs can measure consensus), do you “agree” only with the “policy text” or with the arguments written down in the policy proposal, or with the NCC interpretation (impact analysis), or all of them?
Obviously, if I state only that I agree, I agree that the policy proposal as written is acceptable, and should be implemented, in light of whatever arguments and analysis have been made.
2) What if the text in those 3 pieces are presenting contradictions or can be easily be interpreted in different ways?
In that case, I have probably not seen the contradictions, or don't think that they are contradictions. -- Jan