On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
On 19 Oct 2016, at 13:18, Sebastian Wiesinger <sebastian@karotte.org> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote: ... So, yes, I consider myself still suitable as a WG chair for the address policy WG.
Support. And thank you for doing a job that grows more and more thankless by the day.
+100. I’m stunned beyond disbelief that Gert’s (or Sander’s) credentials could even questioned.
Guess it's a last resort when they see that they are running out of arguments? And amazing that some people have turned to "personal" attacks here rather than discussing the policy at hand. Either way - well handled Gert, you got my full support. Regarding the policy at hand, even considering Nick Hillard's argument it's hard to not support this policy. It at least try to solve a almost impossible problem to solve, better to do some than nothing? So a clear support from me. And our MAIN problem is the few players that really really hard try to game the system, they should be banned somehow but that's hard. I guess we need the board of RIPE NCC to once in a while step up and block things when they see clear abuse. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no