10 May
2012
10 May
'12
5:14 p.m.
On 10 May 2012 14:39, Jan Ingvoldstad <frettled@gmail.com> wrote:
If I understand the rationale correctly, the change essentially means that a LIR has more time to actually implement a use of a transferred block, than they have for a new block.
I am a n00b at these matters, but I don't quite see why this is an important change, and why as much as 24 months is necessary.
24 months was the original time-period for networks to show their networking requirements before the run-out fairly proposals were introduced and it was an attempt to return to those number for transfers rather than have lots of little ones... J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476