On Wednesday 07 June 2006 14:20, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Hi,
I will like to know if anyone has any comments/inputs on this proposal.
I tried to follow the suggestions received after the presentation of the IPv6 PI policy at the last meeting.
I still support PI space and like the contractual relationship with the RIR. I do not like the requirement that the block must be returned after 3 years. That is against the main reason why PI is useful. Freedom of renumbering everytime one needs to change ISP. When one needs to start over after 3 years one might as wel use PA because one needs to renumber once in a while anyway. The whole purpose of PI, in my mind, is to be able to build and extend a business critical and possibly worldwide network without having to renumber for the sake of it. (Not that I want to hardcode IP addresses but a transparent renumbering of a large network is to costly and interferes to much with the core business) Marc -- Marc van Selm NATO C3 Agency CIS Division E-mail: marc.van.selm@nc3a.nato.int (PGP capable)