On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:05:14PM +0200, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
Think I'll just "hijack" this discussion ;p
I fully support the idea of uniting PI and PA into one policy, it's just numbers anyway.
Uh, you're confusing two issues. *This* thread was about being able to turn IPv*4* PI into PA, while keeping the distinction.
Andrea Cima presented at the RIPE meeting, and I expect to see a summary and "next steps" from him soon - especially for the bits that are missing policywise, and Erik Bais volunteered to work with us to fix those.
oh, see that now, sorry.
However, the presentation on the topic from the three (just two onsite) volunteers was very interesting, the consequences and how much it affected was amazing. How did we dig us into such a mess?
*That* is actually about IPv6 land (PA/PI unification, only having a single "type of addresses" anymore), and I'll open a separate thread on that "soonish".
'ki, we're waiting:-) -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no