On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 02:54:33PM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
[x] yes, this makes sense, go there
+1 However: I'd like to see a paragraph defining which resources are "scarce resources" That way, it is immediately clear which resources are covered by hold times etc, and more importantly there is a formal process by which a resource is declared "scarce" (through the PDP). The impact statement currently states: "The RIPE NCC understands "scarce resources" to include IPv4 PA, IPv4 PI and 16-bit AS Numbers. If the community declares other resources to be scarce, the list of resources for which the holding period will apply will be adjusted accordingly." This needs to be part of the policy to avoid doubt and increase clarity to both NCC personnel and resource holders.
Remco suggested adding references to the new policy document in lieu of the removed sections in ripe-638, ripe-649, and ripe-655. I would not object to that.
Sensible addition. rgds, Sascha Luck