10 Jun
2015
10 Jun
'15
12:59 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
While I do consider this only partially relevant to the policy proposal under discussion, it *is* giving a background on what is happening or has happened outside the last /8 range, and some of these transfers indeed make the "30x /22 fast-transferred" issue look fairly marginal.
It is, however, not relevant to the 2015-01 discussion as that is solely about a loop-hole in the last /8 policy. Also it is used to impugn motives of participants and if that is ok now, I might have a thing or two to say as well... rgds, Sascha Luck