-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gert,
*One* person is taking major offence at not being allowed to play with the big boys.
Condescension will get us nowhere. Ok, we're a small ISP in a small market. Since we aim at the business/leased line market only, we may not have 200 customers, let alone 200 IPv6 allocations, within 2 years (I hope to be wrong, of course). Give me *one* good reason why we shouldn't be allowed to offer IPv6 connectivity? Give me a reason why we should lose *one*, otherwise happy, customer because of an arbitrary "line in the sand"?
If you estimate that you will continue to be very small, you could use a /40 or such from one of your upstream ISPs (which is a problem *today*, as there are not enough upstream ISPs, indeed).
This doesn't fly. He can't set his own routing policy and he can't multihome. If he changes the single upstream his customers needs to renumber.
So shall we abandon it?
Yes.
In favour of *what* to replace it?
RIR membership. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNfHOqarNKXTPFCVEQKtOQCg1zOZF0IUfjui3Vdgzf2A/f4HWZIAn1gC 8JG8Zg7yMx6efCwdGb8OpZoy =PTYp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----