Dear Sergey, we were specifically debating the German PostIdent procedure - which is used by (almost?) all German direct/no branch offices/online banks. But AFAIK it is not restricted to German banks, non-German banks might be using it as well. As I am not sure about this - I do not have a non-German bank as an example at hand - I have put "German" in "()". Or shorter: security and trust lies with the process and provider of a service - and not with its users and/or customers. Best, -C. On 25.02.2014 23:16, Sergey Myasoedov wrote:
I can’t agree.
On 25 Feb 2014, at 23:07, Carsten Schiefner <ripe-wgs.cs@schiefner.de> wrote:
what Richard said: what is good enough for (German) banks to e.g. open an account, should be sufficient for the NCC as well, me thinks.
in other words, what is good enough for transistrian/lebanese/BVI/iranian/somalian banks - should be good enough for the NCC? what data quality we are trying to achive?