On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Gert Doering wrote:
- try to come up with new rules for the allocation criteria, dropping the 200-assignments part, and integrate whatever is necessary to balance the remainder.
Wasn't pretty much all of this (except one comment) based on the misconception that you'd actually have to have 200 IPv6 customers, not that you would have *potential* IPv6 customers (i.e: v4 customers, and you willing to give them service)? So I don't think there was such a strong need for removeing the rule, just if we clarified it sufficiently so that people would not (again!) interpret it too strongly. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings