24 Oct
2011
24 Oct
'11
6:07 p.m.
Hi there, On 24 Oct 2011, at 09:41, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
Haven't we already reserved the encompassing /29 per initial /32 the past few years? Does this proposal suggest that a /26 should be reserved for an initial allocation of /29?
This might be a good idea. Asking for impact analysis stats might be funny, along the lines of "RIPENCC running out in 2 millennia rather than 6", but impact analysis/due diligence is important. If we decided to reserve a /26 per future lir, is this in line with and permitted by any global policy, should RIPENCC need to go and ask for more v6 ? Andy