11 Aug
2015
11 Aug
'15
3:13 p.m.
I just read 6.3, 9.3 and 9.4. I don't see which of these I would be in violation of if I went to RIPE NCC and asked for 10k ASNs "because I need them" under the proposed new policy of just recording reason.
Correct! Which is why I don't think I like the new policy. Existing ASN policy suffices if we simply strike one sentence about multi-homing (and then ask the NCC to generally automate the implementation). Existing ASN policy references the criteria in RFC1930 as justification for an ASN, and an audit can rely on the text to clear out any stupidity. Yes?