On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN <ripe-wgs@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote: <snip>
If it can get more support, why not ? 5 stars, why not ? (actually I have some idea why, and it wouldn't bother me) <snip>
To me it seems like there are a not so minor misunderstanding right here. It is not so much about getting MORE support, since we do not vote. What we do are working toward a overall good solution. Unfortunately there are no real good solution, our only option is to change protocol, and with that change some pain will follow which it seems like you and other are experience. Embrace the future, don't run from it and avoid facing it, that is my suggestion. The current policy is there to keep some space in reserve for future startups so they can have _some_ IPv4 space for whatever reason, it is NOT there to give current startups enough IPv4 space, that is just not possible. All pools are either empty or they are running out, and due to ongoing cleanup we are so lucky that there has been IPv4 space returned so the runout will take longer, that is we have _some_ IPv4 space longer than we initial thought was possible! Let us not waste that with being greedy here and now. The only IPv4 left are what can be found from redistribution or splitting up of already allocated IPv4 space, that has it's own ballpark of trouble associated with it, an entire different discussion. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no