Dear colleagues, This proposal makes sense to us. We support it. Best Regards. El lun, 11-03-2019 a las 16:25 +0000, Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg escribió:
Dear colleagues,
After reading the Impact Analysis, i wish to express my support to 2019-01.
Best Regards, Carlos Friaças
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Policy proposal 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA"" is now in the Review Phase.
This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status "ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure.
The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis to support the community?s discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01
And the draft documents at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01/draft
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.
At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.
We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 9 April 2019.
Kind regards,
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum