24 Sep
2017
24 Sep
'17
4:55 a.m.
In both scenarios relying on only IPv4 is insanity,
it's a business decision, and probably has many factors behind it. you and i might think it unwise, but 'insanity' is a bit in the weeds.
They are beyond help
not at all. the vendors are more than happy to sell them CGNs, and other NATs of many flavors. i just don't like the result. but, as i said, we have demonstrated time and again that we can not seriously affect the tragically slow deployment of ipv6. so i do not make decisions based on changing that.
P.S : This time I use my v6 smtp server even though at home I cannot still use a v6 prefix ;)
same here, darn it. welcome to NTT B-Flets land. randy