On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Remco Van Mook <Remco.vanMook@eu.equinix.com> wrote:
Hi Roger,
The decision to give returned address space back to IANA is outside the scope of (this?) allocation policy. The text in this policy however explicitly leaves room for space to be returned to IANA, instead of just stating that any and all returned space MUST be placed into the "final /8 pool", which would have been a valid interpretation had the phrase you quote below not been present - that would block all options to return space to IANA, which would be bad to have in policy.
Hence the 'the below is only valid for space we already decided is not going back to IANA'.
When I now re-reading the text again in the right context I see it. But if I'm the only one that missunderstood it I guess it's okay. -- Roger Jorgensen | rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no