Hi, On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:55:12AM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote:
Well, using 240/3 isn't something that realistic. It is a lot easier to deply IPv6 than to get 240/3 working for any significant amount of users.
Some may prefer easier ways (which is not that much easy to others) and some may not,
240/3 is not going to be easy. *Every* device out there would need to be changed (or at least *checked*) to ensure that it understands that these addresse are not special and can be used as normal unicast space. I could imagine that LI equipment that does not handle IPv6 will not handle Class E space either...
My question is that is this working group the right place to discuss about the 240/3 or it should be done in higher level like between RIRs or IANA?
It has been said before that 240/3 needs to be designated as unicast address space in the IETF first, then IANA could distribute to the RIRs. Pointers to the relevant drafts have been given. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279